Should a 'death clause' kill a deal?

By Margot Slade  | April 20, 2011 - 4:07PM

Mortality--especially someone else's--is probably the last thing you would imagine contemplating in a contract on the way to a close. But a thread on suggests that a "death clause"--nullifying the sale and returning the deposit if a buyer dies--is a real consideration more often than most sellers think. The question is, should it be a deal breaker?

By a narrow margin, the answer is no. The clause probably represents the buyers' emotional and financial reality. "It would have been horrible beyond measure to contemplate living alone in the apartment we intended to make OUR home. And financially, the purchase would have been disastrous/impossible for me to afford if my higher-earning partner died, and extremely difficult for him to afford if I croaked," says one commenter.

Moreover, between contract and closing was eight weeks.  "The risk is so minimal, a seller would be silly to bicker over such a thing," the post said.

Perhaps.  "I never expected in a million years that my cruise to Mexico would have been canceled to the swine flu outbreak, losing my money as the cruise line only offered us a re-schedule that I couldn't use! Things come up in life that you never expect."

That risk can be further reduced, death-clause proponents advise, by pushing for an expedited close and subtracting from the refund the seller's legal fees and, perhaps, out-of-pocket expenses on any new digs, if he or she has one.


Related posts:

Ask an Expert: I can't sell my condo because the sponsor didn't file taxes last year

The upside of a co-op board interview


Brick Underground articles occasionally include the expertise of, or information about, advertising partners when relevant to the story. We will never promote an advertiser's product without making the relationship clear to our readers.