Would you rather have a state of the art gym or a gorgeously landscaped roofdeck?
By Mayra David |July 10, 2013 - 8:55AM
This week we're turning our attention toward building amenities. We asked six New Yorkers whether they'd rather have a state-of-the-art gym in their building or a gorgeous landscaped roof deck? Here's what they had to say:
Gym: A gym, of course. Working out is necessary, while sitting around and tanning is actually pretty bad for your health anyway. -Alyson, Midtown West
Gym: A gym because that would (I presume) save me some money on a gym membership. Even if there were a small fee to join one, at least I would be getting something substantial out of it. A roof deck is nice on occassion, I guess. But if you think about it, sitting out on the hot roof of a building sounds pretty awful to me. And then I wouldn’t even get anything out of it during the colder, wetter seasons -Jim, Chelsea
Roofdeck: I’d rather have a roofdeck because I actually like my gym anyway. We have a spa, and having multiple locations is great, too. A roof deck would be a nice bonus, especially if they did it right, with lots of shaded areas, and if we were allowed to barbeque. -Martin, Harlem
Gym: There are plenty of roof top bars around if I want to see a view. -Kelvin, Gramercy
A roofdeck ...my way: I’d love to have a roofdeck that wasn’t landscaped to perfection, but rather one where they give tenants little garden plots. Just a roof deck with lounge chairs is kind of a waste. -Cynthia, Chelsea
Gym… ? A gym would be the good for the body and the roof deck would be good for the mind. I’d flip a coin and hope it lands on gym, I guess. -Aguilar, Morningside Heights.
Brick Underground articles occasionally include the expertise of, or information about, advertising partners when relevant to the story. We will never promote an advertiser's product without making the relationship clear to our readers.