Neighborhood Intel

Warning: If you buy a landmarked property, better keep it up, or get sued

By Lucy Cohen Blatter | August 19, 2015 - 1:59PM

In an uncommon move, the city's Landmarks Preservation Commission has filed a lawsuit against the owner of a dilapidated 133-year-old house on Harlem's historic Astor Row, reports DNA Info.

According to city law, landmarked homes must remain in good repair. The commission is hoping to compel the owner of the property, who bought the three-story, red-brick home for just under $30,000 28 years ago, to rehab it. (Astor Row is on the south side of West 130th Street between Lenox Avenue and Fifth Avenue.)

The front lawn is apparently overgrown, interior floors and walls have collapsed and most of the roof is missing.  One neighbor told DNA Info that the home is also missing a gutter, causing rainwater to leak into the ceiling of his building. The house is boarded up and covered with graffiti. A “Keep Out” sign is affixed to the door, according to the site.

The current owner claims she is waiting to sell her Queens home in order to get the money she needs to renovate the Harlem home and move in.

The lawsuit asks a judge to fine her $5,000 a day until she renovates the home, which could decimate that renovation budget.


A landmarked home is quaint, but no so practical

7 things to consider before buying in a landmarked building

50 years on, Landmark law is still hotly debated

5 New York homes where you can live in a landmark

Ask an Expert: Renovating in an about-to-be landmarked building

Brick Underground articles occasionally include the expertise of, or information about, advertising partners when relevant to the story. We will never promote an advertiser's product without making the relationship clear to our readers.